Pine-to-Python verification report
Real TradingView Pine scripts, run as Python.
PyneComp converts open-source Pine Script™ into Python. PyneCore runs the converted scripts on real market data, and this report compares plots and trades against TradingView's own output.
PyneCore is validated against TradingView on 1,000 published Pine scripts; last run . How it is measured
Every script in the corpus goes through the same four steps. Failures are published in the same table as the successes.
PyneComp converts the original Pine source to Python. Nobody edits the output by hand.
PyneCore executes the converted script over 25,000+ bars of real exchange data without errors.
The run emitted numeric plot or trade data that can be checked. Drawing-only scripts are reported separately.
Plot and trade outputs are compared bar by bar and trade by trade against TradingView's own reference.
Indicators are compared plot by plot and strategies trade by trade against TradingView's own output. The counts cover the scripts that have a comparable numeric reference. A plot PyneCore fails to reproduce counts as a divergence, not as a missing reference. Details for each script are in The Corpus below.
indicators clearing the ≥99% plot-match threshold
trade-producing strategies clearing the ≥99% whole-trade timing threshold
of the compared plotted values were the identical IEEE-754 double
The manifest pins the exact source of every script with a SHA-256 hash, and TradingView keeps every published version, so anyone can re-run the comparison.
symbol = BINANCE:BTCUSDTtimeframe = 30 minexceptions = 48 scripts on their own marketbars = 25,000+ per scriptulp_limit = 64 (libm tier)rel_tol = 1e-9scale_floor = 1e-9 x series mediannet_tol = 2.0% of the larger netreference = TradingView exportsources = SHA-256 pinned manifest
A script enters the corpus only if it is published open source, written in a supported Pine version, and its header does not forbid reuse. The detected license is recorded in the manifest.
Only the manifest (name, author, link, license, version, SHA-256) is published. The Pine sources are downloaded locally for the measurement and are not re-hosted.
Reference plots and trade lists come from running the original script on TradingView itself, on the same symbol, timeframe and bar range.
Scripts that time out or hit a harness limit are listed with the result they got.
A match percentage only says the outputs landed inside a tolerance band, and we chose that band. So each compared value is also checked on a scale we did not choose: the IEEE-754 double both engines store it in. Adjacent doubles are one step apart, and that step is the smallest difference the type can represent.
log, exp, pow or a
trig function). IEEE-754 requires + − × ÷ and
sqrt to be correctly rounded but says nothing about these, so CPython's
C library and TradingView's Java runtime can both be correct and still end up a few
representable values apart. A long accumulation then carries the difference forward.
The tier is capped at 64 representable values. We set the cap from measurement: the
widest such gap in our own reference corpus is 23. A script that stays inside the cap
but calls no transcendental function does not get this label.
In the table these two tiers appear under the Verified badge, because they only say how closely a verified script matched. A verified script with no tier line agreed within the published band. The band is a single relative tolerance. Near zero a relative test has nothing to compare against, so it falls back to a floor taken from the series' median magnitude. A fixed absolute floor would not work: a series around 100,000 could never reach it, and for a series around 0.000001 it would be larger than the whole signal.
All scripts that agreed within the band, worst relative gap first. A single worst-case figure or a mean would hide this spread.
| script | max_rel | sig. figures |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Learning Moving Average [LuxAlgo] | 6.3 × 10⁻¹² | ~11 |
| TSI CCI Hull with profit$$$ | 2.8 × 10⁻¹² | ~11 |
| Reaction Path [BullByte] | 9.0 × 10⁻¹³ | ~12 |
| the other 12 scripts | < 10⁻¹² | 12+ |
You can check any result yourself: take the same script, run it on your own TradingView subscription and compare the output with PyneSys.
The most-liked open-source Pine scripts on TradingView, in order of popularity. If you sort or filter the table, the page remembers your choice. Every name links to the original publication.
| EWO,RSI advanced Signals Strategy - Exhaustion Filter | STRv6 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%5 plots | 100%431 / 431 | ✓100.000% | 24,126 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Forex Fractal EMA Scalper | STRv5 | Verified | — | 100%3,131 / 3,131 | ✓100.000% | 29,599 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Combo Backtest 123 Reversal & RSI | STRv4 | Verified | — | 100%344 / 344 | ✓100.000% | 29,597 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Tick-Tock (UT Bot Alert + Linear Regression Candles) | STRv6 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%11 plots | 100%1,039 / 1,039 | ✓100.000% | 30,686 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Hybrid: RSI + Breakout + Dashboard | STRv6 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%1 plot | 100%3,874 / 3,874 | ✓100.000% | 30,686 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| RSI and Smoothed RSI Bull Div Strategy [BigBitsIO] | STRv4 | Verified | — | 100%55 / 55 | ✓100.000% | 29,604 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Universal Breakout Strategy [KedArc Quant] | STRv6 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%9 plots | 100%561 / 561 | ✓100.000% | 30,688 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Coral Trend Pullback Strategy (TradeIQ) | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%12 plots | 100%63 / 63 | ✓100.000% | 29,603 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Simple EMA Long Only Strategy | STRv4 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%4 plots | 100%356 / 356 | ✓100.000% | 29,603 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| 3-Signal Directional Trend Strategy for E-Minis | STRv5 | Verified | — | 100%814 / 814 | ✓100.000% | 29,604 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Simple RSI strategy | STRv4 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%8 plots | 100%742 / 742 | ✓100.000% | 29,603 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Strategy Myth-Busting #6 - PSAR+MA+SQZMOM+HVI - [MYN] | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%11 plots | 100%57 / 57 | ✓100.000% | 29,650 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Pivot of Pivot Reversal Strategy [QuantNomad] | STRv4 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%4 plots | 100%298 / 298 | ✓100.000% | 29,650 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| BEST Trailing Stop Strategy | STRv4 | Lookahead | 99.96%7 plots | 97.18%814 / 814 | ✗114.902% | 29,651 | |
Lookahead, measured. The script was run once with PyneCore's own rules and once with TradingView's future leaks restored (an open higher-timeframe period read as if it had closed, or a body re-running mid-bar that is handed the completed bar). Its plots differ between the two runs, so its results depend on data its bars could not have had, and its TradingView reference is a lookahead result too. With the future leaks restored on the PyneCore side as well, its plots match TradingView 100%. Kept out of the accuracy score. Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Technicals Rating Strategy v420 | STRv4 | Verified | — | 100%1,851 / 1,851 | ✓100.000% | 29,651 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| RSI Overbought Oversold Divergence Strategy w/ Buy/Sell Signals | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%63 plots | 100%498 / 498 | ✓100.000% | 29,651 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Moving Average Scalper | STRv4 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%4 plots | 100%81 / 81 | ✓100.000% | 29,652 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| RSI Crossover Strategy with Compounding (Monthly) | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%2 plots | 100%2 / 2 | ✓100.000% | 29,652 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Chandelier Exit Strategy with 200 EMA Filter | STRv5 | Verified | — | 100%542 / 542 | ✓100.000% | 29,653 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Davin's 10/200MA Pullback on SPY Strategy v2.0 | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%5 plots | 100%553 / 553 | ✓100.000% | 29,652 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| X48 - Strategy | MA Type Cross + TPSL | Future&Spot | V.2 | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%24 plots | 100%744 / 744 | ✓100.000% | 29,652 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Mutanabby_AI | Algo Pro Strategy | STRv5 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%1 plot | 100%288 / 288 | ✓100.000% | 29,704 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Trading Report Generator from CSV | STRv6 | Verified | — | 100%2 / 2 | ✓100.000% | 30,687 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Buy-Sell with Adaptive Market Intelligence Engine | INDv6 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%3 plots | — | — | 30,641 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
| Z-Score Range Boxes Breakout [BigBeluga] | INDv6 | Verifiedbit-exact | 100%4 plots | — | — | 30,614 | |
Accuracy
Run
Data window
Source
SHA-256 | |||||||
No scripts match the current filters.
Every script on this page was compiled by PyneComp and run by PyneCore. Both are live.
Try PyneComp Convert your first Pine script at pynesys.ioThis website uses cookies and similar technologies. By continuing to use the site, you accept this. Details in our Privacy Policy.