Pine-to-Python verification report

Pyne in the Wild

Real TradingView Pine scripts, run as Python.

PyneComp converts open-source Pine Script™ into Python. PyneCore runs the converted scripts on real market data, and this report compares plots and trades against TradingView's own output.

  1. Pine Script
  2. PyneComp
  3. PyneCore (Python)
  4. TradingView reference
544 published scripts open-source Pine Script corpus
743 TV-comparable outputs 484 plot + 259 trade outputs
100% TV fidelity 743/743 comparable outputs verified
99.669% bit-exact values All remaining values matched within published tolerance

The Proof Ladder

Every script in the corpus climbs the same four rungs. No cherry-picking — failures are published right next to the successes.

T0

Compiles

PyneComp converts the original Pine source into runnable Python, untouched by human hands.

544 / 544 scripts
T1

Runs

PyneCore executes the converted script over 25,000+ bars of real exchange data without errors.

544 / 544 compiled
T2

Has measurable output

The run emitted numeric plot or trade data that can be checked. Drawing-only scripts are reported separately.

524 / 544 with plot/trade output
T3

Matches TradingView

Plot and trade outputs are compared bar by bar and trade by trade against TradingView's own reference.

743 / 743 outputs
484 plot + 259 trade outputs

Results at a Glance

Indicators compared plot by plot, strategies trade by trade, against TradingView's own output. The headline counts are over the scripts that produce a comparable numeric reference; a plot PyneCore fails to reproduce counts as a divergence, never as "no reference". Corpus coverage and each script's full detail are in The Corpus below.

Corpus outcome

544 scripts
  • 512Matches TradingView
  • 0Diverges from TradingView
  • 11Depends on lookahead
  • 1Data-limited (unavailable feed)
  • 20Runs (no reference output)
  • 0Run failed

Indicators — plot verification

251 / 251

indicators clearing the ≥99% plot-match threshold

  • Comparable plot references251 / 272
  • Compared plots >=99%251 / 251
  • Exact plot matches251 / 251
  • Mean on compared plots100%
  • Worst per-script plot match100%

Strategies — trade timing

261 / 259

strategies clearing the ≥99% entry and exit timing threshold

  • Trade references available259 / 272
  • Entry+exit timing >=99%261 / 259
  • Fully verified strategy outputs261 / 272
  • Trades compared in total214,868
  • Exact trade-count matches261 / 259
  • Net profit within tolerance259 / 259
  • Mean entry/exit timing match100% / 100%

How closely — the numbers themselves

99.669%

of the compared plotted values were the identical IEEE-754 double

  • Plotted values compared67,701,224
  • Identical to the bit67,477,563 (99.669%)
  • Scripts bit-exact throughout465 / 484
  • Explained by libm last bits3 / 484
  • Rest, within the published band16 / 484
  • Worst relative gap from TradingView1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰ (~9 sig. figures)

Methodology

Reproducible by design. The manifest pins the exact source of every script with a SHA-256 hash — and TradingView keeps every published version forever, so anyone can re-run the comparison.

run parameters 
symbol      = BINANCE:BTCUSDTtimeframe   = 30 minexceptions  = 23 scripts on their own marketbars        = 25,000+ per scriptulp_limit   = 64 (libm tier)rel_tol     = 1e-9scale_floor = 1e-9 x series mediannet_tol     = 2.0% of the larger netreference   = TradingView exportsources     = SHA-256 pinned manifest
1

Open-source scripts only

A script enters the corpus only if it is published open source, written in a supported Pine version, and its header does not forbid reuse. The detected license is recorded in the manifest.

2

No source redistribution

Only the manifest (name, author, link, license, version, SHA-256) is published. Pine sources are fetched locally, used for measurement, never re-hosted.

3

TradingView is the reference

Reference plots and trade lists come from running the original script on TradingView itself, on the same symbol, timeframe and bar range.

4

Failures stay on the board

Scripts that time out or hit harness limits are reported as-is. A proof you can't falsify is not a proof.

“Matches” is a weak word. Here is what it means.

A percentage only says the outputs landed inside a band, and a band is something we chose. So each compared value is also placed on the one scale that is not ours to choose — the IEEE-754 double both engines store it in. Consecutive representable doubles are one step apart; that step is the finest distinction the type can make.

  • bit-exact Every compared bar produced the identical double. Not “close enough”: the same 64 bits, from the first bar to the last.
  • libm The values differ only in the last bits of the mantissa, and the script reaches a transcendental function — log, exp, pow, the trig family. IEEE-754 requires + − × ÷ and sqrt to be correctly rounded, and requires nothing of those, so CPython's C library and TradingView's Java runtime can both be right and still land a few representable values apart — which a long accumulation then carries forward. The tier is capped at 64 representable values, chosen from measurement: across our own reference corpus the widest such gap is 23. A script whose numbers sit inside that cap but reaches no transcendental is not labelled this way; an explanation has to explain something.

The two tiers sit under the Verified badge in the table, because that is what they are: the rung a verified script reached, never a verdict of their own. Anything else carries no tier line — it agreed within the published band, which is what the Verified badge above already says. The band itself is one number, not two — a relative tolerance. Near zero a relative test has nothing to be relative to, so it falls back on a floor taken from the series' own median magnitude; a fixed absolute floor would be unreachable for a series living at 100,000 and larger than the whole signal for one living at 0.000001.

The band itself, script by script

Agreement “within the band” is a range, not a verdict, so here is the whole tier — worst relative gap first. The worst case is one number; the shape underneath it — a single outlier over a floor of near-exact agreement — is what a bare worst-case or a mean would throw away.

scriptmax_relsig. figures
Machine Learning Moving Average [LuxAlgo]1.2 × 10⁻¹⁰~9
Easy System 4201.0 × 10⁻¹¹~10
EMA Slope - RSI Oscillator Strategy7.5 × 10⁻¹²~11
OBV MACD Indicator5.2 × 10⁻¹²~11
TSI CCI Hull with profit$$$2.8 × 10⁻¹²~11
the other 11 scripts< 10⁻¹²12+

Don't take our word for it. Every script is pinned by SHA-256, and TradingView keeps every published version. Pull the same script, run it on your own TradingView subscription, and compare it with PyneSys. The numbers are the numbers.

The Corpus

The most-liked open-source Pine scripts on TradingView, in order of community popularity (or whatever you sort the table by — the choice is remembered). Every name links to the original publication.

Hull Suite Strategyby DashTrader 14,384STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%2 plots
100%668 / 668
✓100.000%28,016
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared668 TV / 668 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)12,043 / 12,043
  • Plots compared2
  • Plotted values compared55,910
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotMHULL

Run

  • Bars executed28,016
  • Run time2.45 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.09 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-07 15:30
  • Bars28,016

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2566debed0d170689f7c2ad77b449413c6a4877271d117546776d307b644a51be0e

View on TradingView
Linear Regression Oscillator [ChartPrime]by ChartPrime · MPL-2.0 14,258INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%15 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared15
  • Plotted values compared311,087
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotColor Candles (open)

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time2.78 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.10 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256e5a927cc8bd717ac689264fdd13eae261c0071ebe8b0ef3bd53c9f140f4d6c80

View on TradingView
ORB Algo | Flux Chartsby fluxchart · MPL-2.0 14,176INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%11 plots
—
—20,208
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared11
  • Plotted values compared63
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotTP 1

Run

  • Bars executed20,208
  • Run time1.04 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolNASDAQ:AAPL
  • Timeframe5 min
  • From2025-07-28 13:30
  • To2026-08-07 19:55
  • Bars20,208

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv5
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2561f445065638a00d9e1019026793f3406bff528e7ff0875fecceaed827014d26c

View on TradingView
Buy&Sell Strategy depends on AO+Stoch+RSI+ATR by SerdarYILMAZby SerdarYILMAZ 13,736STRv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
100%193 / 193
✓100.000%28,016
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Trades compared193 TV / 193 Pyne
  • Whole-trade match100%
  • Entry timing match100%
  • Exit timing match100%
  • Net profit (TV / Pyne)4,511 / 4,511
  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared111,992
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed28,016
  • Run time1.39 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-07 15:30
  • Bars28,016

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2568926bd4773c0d30d791a208506839217677621c1b47b270ec5bba3952bd07ab8

View on TradingView
Ripster EMA Cloudsby ripster47 · MPL-2.0 13,696INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%10 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared10
  • Plotted values compared169,382
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotShort Leading EMA1

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time1.35 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv3
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2565f0b5c7c5e6e4bba80d06bd5f311ceed48b06744bd9866bf4d6abb7307880b59

View on TradingView
TV Community Algoby HomelessLemon · CC 13,661INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%23 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared23
  • Plotted values compared197,648
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotBasis

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Secondary-feed bars292,519
  • Total bars processed320,768
  • Run time196.15 s CPU
  • Per-bar time6.94 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249
  • Security @ 1 min99,995 bars
  • Security @ 5 min99,999 bars
  • Security @ 15 min42,002 bars
  • Security @ 60 min22,909 bars
  • Security @ 120 min15,834 bars
  • Security @ 240 min7,918 bars
  • Security @ W min470 bars
  • Security @ M min109 bars
  • Security @ D min3,283 bars

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv6
  • LicenseCC

SHA-256a957991c415a9d1cc9d8b495c2a8192c85db7b77810b2c3fb02ef9dcc15e644b

View on TradingView
Volumatic Variable Index Dynamic Average [BigBeluga]by BigBeluga · CC 13,543INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
—
—27,614
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared55,027
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotPlot

Run

  • Bars executed27,614
  • Run time45.62 s CPU
  • Per-bar time1.65 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:30
  • Bars27,614

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv4
  • LicenseCC

SHA-25644220518231ffaec6c7f44b414e6d375cbd453c9733c49f65de4dff736d2c34b

View on TradingView
Range Filter Buy and Sell 5min - guikroth versionby PHVNTOM_TRADER 13,524INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared140,351
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotRange Filter

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time1.00 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256975e3740e7737d7968678816d9fb24ca75788c102f6fbe64973bb0b92a32dc23

View on TradingView
MavilimWby KivancOzbilgic 13,426INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%2 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared2
  • Plotted values compared28,171
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotMAVW

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time1.09 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv8
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2567619bb34c8260ecc728b1d0ebe09ae0f0230b400e320658cacded1492c6b11dc

View on TradingView
Zig Zag Channels [LuxAlgo]by LuxAlgo · CC 13,391INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared221
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotCircles

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time0.99 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv2
  • LicenseCC

SHA-25620c18487321d4d36a58454dafbc2af01fb95506ca027e8d891a5cdae79aa52ff

View on TradingView
Trend Targets [AlgoAlpha]by AlgoAlpha · MPL-2.0 13,386INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared28,107
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotBullish Rejection

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Run time1.70 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.06 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25671dde6c88d02556055c96f4296de41d8fbccce195dfeab2a05da230d51ccd492

View on TradingView
Volume Profile [LuxAlgo]by LuxAlgo · CC 13,195INDv4Runs
—
—
—28,250

Accuracy

  • Reference outputno comparable plots exported

Run

  • Bars executed28,250
  • Run time1.08 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:30
  • Bars28,250

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv3
  • LicenseCC

SHA-2562b50dc73764ab4115c6dad31579026cf9733d628c1f0b9c47e39bf8bfede98fd

View on TradingView
UT Bot by Yo_adriiiiaan 13,162INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%3 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared84,720
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotTrailing Stop

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time1.02 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv6
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2564ac5dbd40d0a0f62bd776f82ba4145b30f7a619e0ddee49f1b28e979feb0c052

View on TradingView
Trend Type Indicator by BobRivera990by BobRivera990 · MPL-2.0 13,051INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—28,249
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared141,216
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotBand_3

Run

  • Bars executed28,249
  • Run time1.83 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.06 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 12:00
  • Bars28,249

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25639a2be4610822601ff545f888c6686a266675178429932a17a1e0bf83aecbc2c

View on TradingView
Support Resistance - Dynamicby LonesomeTheBlue · MPL-2.0 13,023INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%3 plots
—
—28,268
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared59,347
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotShapes

Run

  • Bars executed28,268
  • Run time6.42 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.23 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 21:30
  • Bars28,268

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv7
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2560098ce670ab11c5dde43dc86a4d53d692bb0cb3c599a019a0e1a615d6b224473

View on TradingView
SMC Structures and FVGby LudoGH68 · MPL-2.0 13,008INDv5Runs
—
—
—28,268

Accuracy

  • Reference outputno comparable plots exported

Run

  • Bars executed28,268
  • Run time4.60 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.16 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 21:30
  • Bars28,268

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv7
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-256ca335efef98283029c151b4992e54846d0327a81701421bd5d2ee124ab5547cf

View on TradingView
Precision Sniper [WillyAlgoTrader]by WillyAlgoTrader 12,956INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%3 plots
—
—27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared3
  • Plotted values compared82,839
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotEMA Fast

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Run time4.19 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.15 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv4
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-256d6de1eafc4309bd64ad8214e28f29e141c3f41d9e8afe56c98ac5926b3b1bbb0

View on TradingView
QQE MODby Mihkel00 12,880INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%4 plots
—
—27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared4
  • Plotted values compared73,734
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotSecondary QQE Trend Line

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Run time1.56 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.06 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv2
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2563618fcc7662d0e31acbf703321c1b920eab0f7b31d62c32b9521b291af9946bf

View on TradingView
Quantitative Qualitative Estimation QQEby KivancOzbilgic · MPL-2.0 12,864INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—28,268
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared86,471
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotFAST

Run

  • Bars executed28,268
  • Run time1.06 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 21:30
  • Bars28,268

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-25694e2b7421857d61a40ad6ae05a6e1cdbfecc864773098d5d05ee57ef4e2d1a2d

View on TradingView
SuperTrendby everget · GPL 12,792INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%7 plots
—
—27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared7
  • Plotted values compared57,021
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotLong Stop

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Run time1.05 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv10
  • LicenseGPL

SHA-25650865e653525728caf717f962855eae10f1bf4d3651c1157e316646a3376ebe4

View on TradingView
FVG Instantaneous Mitigation Signals [LuxAlgo]by LuxAlgo · CC 12,711INDv5Verifiedbit-exact
100%1 plot
—
—28,268
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared1
  • Plotted values compared28,263
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotTrailing Stop

Run

  • Bars executed28,268
  • Run time1.09 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 21:30
  • Bars28,268

Source

  • Pine versionv5, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseCC

SHA-256e8821829286ed6015763787881e0365e2869e361852709a599e0cb68f1027345

View on TradingView
Bollinger Awesome Alert R1 by JustUncleLby JustUncleL 12,702INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%8 plots
—
—28,268
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared8
  • Plotted values compared226,047
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotBasis Line

Run

  • Bars executed28,268
  • Run time1.24 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-12 21:30
  • Bars28,268

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv5
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-25607ccbf7b4565df47786127cdbecb1b815406cdd73e5d7cac987b8ed545539f12

View on TradingView
HalfTrendby everget · GPL 12,530INDv6Verifiedbit-exact
100%7 plots
—
—27,613
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared7
  • Plotted values compared85,471
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotHalfTrend

Run

  • Bars executed27,613
  • Run time1.15 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.04 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-07-30 06:00
  • Bars27,613

Source

  • Pine versionv6
  • Script revisionv3
  • LicenseGPL

SHA-2566587a9be145fb58e6a6cd1971aefd7744595fa07aa30d29ea0a158e0ed371562

View on TradingView
Stochastic OTTby KivancOzbilgic · MPL-2.0 12,520INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%5 plots
—
—28,335
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared5
  • Plotted values compared56,670
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plot%K

Run

  • Bars executed28,335
  • Run time2.07 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.07 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-14 07:00
  • Bars28,335

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • LicenseMPL-2.0

SHA-2560e9ea9cdca98a757e60073c2c20ee45bdf99d1135f78e99160d816dd5302d66a

View on TradingView
Linear Regression Candlesby ugurvu 12,392INDv4Verifiedbit-exact
100%9 plots
—
—28,335
Plot match vs TradingView100%

Accuracy

  • Plots compared9
  • Plotted values compared141,615
  • Identical to the bit100%
  • Worst gapsame double
  • Pearson correlation (min)1.000000
  • Worst-matching plotLinReg Candles (open)

Run

  • Bars executed28,335
  • Run time1.46 s CPU
  • Per-bar time0.05 ms/bar CPU (per chart bar)

Data window

  • SymbolBINANCE:BTCUSDT
  • Timeframe30 min
  • From2025-01-01 00:00
  • To2026-08-14 07:00
  • Bars28,335

Source

  • Pine versionv4, converted to v6 by PyneComp
  • Script revisionv1
  • Licenseunspecified

SHA-2562885750bea5b989df7fd7e1beab7322071f918ad5f9629fb5e031d8eab32268b

View on TradingView

Every script on this page was compiled by PyneComp and run by PyneCore. Both are live.

Try PyneComp Convert your first Pine script at pynesys.io